Joseph S R de Saram CISSP FBCS MIEEE MIScT MINCOSE MACS Snr CP
Joseph S R de Saram CISSP provides thought-provoking insights into Military Intelligence and Law Enforcement, how they operate beyond (as opposed to above) the law, and how their various antics foreseeably lead to the destruction of Fundamental Human Rights. Updates are in progress so check back regularly – verified articles end with √. Please feel free to LIKE and SHARE…
Notwithstanding the hundreds of videos that I have of actors farting around with bikes and rucksacks, this article confirms via forensic evidence that
On 30 December 2015 I had been to Lanka Hospitals (Apollo) to [voluntarily!] see a Psychiatrist (that old chestnut) remember the journey. it was dark and raining, and I would have been difficult to track visually. However, a group of IMSI catchers [virtually] simultaneously received the command to lock onto me. This is actually quite easy to do in software – if I were running the operation I would have used a laptop (one main, one failover) to send the commands to the ISMI catchers in series to acquire the target’s location, with say a few centiseconds delay – and then cycle that process for a bit 🙂
However, in a similar way to a [normal] ‘Klingon Bird of Prey being unable to fire its torpedoes whilst cloaked‘, the group of IMSI catchers are forced to reveal their IDs at [virtually] the same time in order to triangulate my position.
Note how my mobile has been downgraded to a 2.0/2.5G EDGE connection, represented by the E icon at the top!
Accordingly, I simply took screenshots of the Cell IDs of each IMSI Catcher (now 6) in turn, and we have this.
a
a
a
Also note how Cell 1071 increases in signal strength to -65dBm
a
a
a
Also note how Cell 1071 increases in signal strength to -65dBm
a
a
a
And back to ‘normal’ cellular interception once I was at home for the night:-
And control has been passed to a previously dormant fake base transceiver station afterwards. As it happened that particular one was one of the ‘primary cellular interceptors’:-
As I have mentioned earlier Cellular Interception via IMSI Catchers allow the calls to be decrypted and monitored. Only one BTS is required for this function, and the target mobile would connect to that.
However the evidence confirming Triangulation is significant because:-
(A) My rough location could already be determined from connecting to only one BTS;
(B) However, it would not be accurate enough, if the operational prerequisites were that there had to be ‘VISUAL CONFIRMATION AT ALL TIMES’;
(C) The [foreign] actors cannot ‘MAINTAIN VISUAL CONFIRMNATION AT ALL TIMES’ if they do not know my ACCURATE PHYSICAL LOCATION;
(D) To reacquire ‘Joe’s accurate physical location‘ for ‘visual confirmation at all times‘, especially in the dark:-
(E) Accordingly:-
This is EXACTLY what I was looking to achieve by MY OPERATION. I waited until it was dark and raining, and told the driver to take shortcuts to get me home (meaning using small side roads and not using the main roads wherever possible).
I knew that the actors would not be able to maintain visual confirmation at all times, and it would force them to triangulate my position, if indeed the operational prerequisite was to FOLLOW ME 🙂
As I have said before:-
These are the Cell Map forensics for Adrian Cumine, confirming the existence of Traingulation and therefore confirmation of ‘visual pursuit’ – ie ‘FOLLOWING’
These are the Cell Map forensics for Chamaree Silva, confirming the existence of Traingulation and therefore confirmation of ‘visual pursuit’ – ie ‘FOLLOWING’
These are my Cell Map forensics confirming the existence of Traingulation and therefore confirmation of ‘visual pursuit’ – ie ‘FOLLOWING’
By now everyone should know why the retards have the audacity to say that I am the one with the ‘mental problem‘
Joseph S R de Saram CISSP FBCS MIEEE MIScT MINCOSE MACS Snr CP